The Lindbergh Kidnapping Hoax 

 Anna Schoeffler Hauptmann 

  Directory      Books      Search      Home     Forum     Transcript      Sources 

     The State of NJ v. Bruno Richard  Hauptmann: FAIRNESS ON TRIAL 

    Lindbergh Archivist  Discovers  NEW EVIDENCE 

  Freedom of Information Act - 1368 pages of Lindbergh Files

 Forensic Evidence Removed By American Lindbergh Family

Anna Schoeffler married Richard Hauptmann in 1925, two years before The Lone Eagle's historic flight and seven years before the disappearance of the aviator's son. She was introduced to him by a friend, Lena Aldinger.

Police quickly agreed that Anna had nothing to do with the crime. But, the police believed she was naive in accepting her husband's story. 

Anna's testimony completely backed up her husband's story .

When told that March 1 was a Tuesday, she said Richard had been with her at Fredericksen's  Bakery, (owned by Katie and Christian Fredericksen)  where she worked every Tuesday evening. 

She always  worked late on Tuesdays and Richard (no one ever called him Bruno) usually met her there to take her home.

On April 2, the evening of the ransom drop-off in the Bronx cemetery, she had been with Richard and Hans Kloeppenburg for their "musical evening."

 

On November 26, 1933, the day a ticket taker, Cecile Barr, claimed that Hauptmann had purchased a ticket from her

 in a Greenwhich Village, Loewe's movie house 

with a ransom bill , Anna said it was her husband's birthday and that she always threw a little birthday party for him. 

How could he have been in a Greenwhich Village movie house if he was attending his own birthday party?

Anna strongly believed in her husband's innocence until her death in October of 1994.

She and her attorney, Robert Bryan of San Francisco, made numerous appeals to reopen her husband's case.

 Finally in defeat, she was advised by New Jersey Gov. James Florio  that history  would have to judge whether Richard had been framed by the NJ Police in 1935. 

Although she had been unable to help her husband escape the death penalty, she devoted the rest of her life claiming his innocence. In an interview in 1981, she said,   

"...Some of them - they know they were lying. They knew they were lying."

 She died on October 10, 1994......waiting  for  "history"!

 

Obituary of Anna Hauptmann 

PHILADELPHIA -  Anna Hauptmann, the widow of the man executed for the kidnaping and murder of aviator Charles Lindbergh's infant son, has died.

     Her death Oct. 10 in New Holland, Pa., was reported this week by the

Lancaster New Era newspaper, a nearby neighborhood publication.

     She insisted for more than 60 years that Bruno Richard Hauptmann was

innocent.  She had spent much of her life trying in vain to clear her husband of what was called the Crime of the Century: the 1932 killing of the 20-month-old namesake of Lindbergh.

     Hauptmann, a German immigrant carpenter, was accused of kidnapping the Lindbergh boy from his nursery in Hopewell, N.J. He denied it, and his wife insisted that he was with her the night the child was taken.      Hauptmann was convicted in 1935 and executed in 1936.

     "God knows that my husband was innocent," 

she said in 1986 in one of her final interviews.

          1994/ The Times Mirror Company

 

         
 
Anna Hauptmann Quote 
 submitted by Michael Melsky on the LKH Forum 


From "Proclaimed His Innocence" by Robert Bryan:                

Mrs. Anna Hauptmann, the 94 year-old widow of Richard Hauptmann, said to me this afternoon:

"My Richard was not involved in what happened to that poor little Lindbergh child in New Jersey. Richard and I were together that night in New York. We did not know about the kidnapping until the next day. People must not forget that my Richard was innocent. They know in New Jersey that he was innocent.

I just re-read again Richard's last letter to me written just before he died. He begged for the truth. And they did such terrible things to him in that prison. I know he is with God. All these 57 years has not been living. I pray to God. The most important thing is that God knows the truth. I beg Gov. Jim Florio to do the right thing, and clear Richard's name. I want to die knowing that the truth was finally recognized."

 

 

 

United States District Court,

D. New Jersey

Anna HAUPTMANN, Plaintiff,

v.

David T. WILENTZ, et al., Defendants.

Civ. No. 81-3177.

Aug. 11, 1983

 Widow of individual convicted and executed for 1932 kidnapping of infant son of famous aviator brought civil rights act suit against the then state prosecutor, state police officers and others seeking declaratory and monetary relief for alleged violations of widow's and husband's constitutional rights. Defendants moved to dismiss.   The District Court, Lacey, J., held that:  (1) prosecutor had absolute immunity on claims that he used false, perjured or misleading testimony and concealed exculpatory evidence;  (2) prosecutor had qualified immunity from liability for alleged authorization of illegal wiretapping and eavesdropping as part of investigative process;  (3) other claims against prosecutor were timely barred by limitations or were not alleged with sufficient specificity;  (4) claimant failed to satisfy the "color of state law" requirement as regards claims against publisher who hired chief defense counsel;  (5) no claim was made out under civil rights conspiracy statutes based on denial of equal protection by virtue of national origin discrimination against husband, a German immigrant;  (6) claims against FBI agent were dismissible on immunity or pleading deficiency grounds;  (7) claims against state police officers were time-barred, suffered from pleading deficiencies or involved matters of immunity;  (8) there was no tolling of the statutes of limitations;  and (9) civil rights act suit could not be used to overturn conviction.

 Motions granted.

Letter to the New Jersey Historical Museum in East Brunswick

submitted to the LKH Public Forum by 

Richard Sloan

"2/27/93
Dear Mr. Runyon:
I received your letter & I want to thank you very much. Well do I remember when I was at the Museum & that I stayed with Mrs. Auer. I also met Mrs. Edna Auer, both Ladies were so kind to me, & I often think about them. I also remember that you were the one who discovered the missing papers which meant so much. Daily I hope & pray that Richards name would be cleared, he was as innocent as you & I. If Governor Florio would stand up for the truth & declare my Husband was innocent the public, the whole world would look up to him, admire him. he would be a greater Hero then Col. Lindbergh because he had the courage to stand up for the truth.
---------------------
I wrote, I begged your Governor if I could see him, the answer was no. ["no" is underlined.] He had no time for Anna Hauptmann or was he afraid to hear the truth? I still pray for him. Every witness for the prosecution lied. they swore on the Bible to tell the truth. they lied. some were paid to lie. Col. Lindbergh lied. he never heard my Husband
say hi Doctor because Richard was never there.
They All ["All" is underlined] have to stand before God some day. When I die I do not have to be afraid. I always told the truth. I always will. God is with me & he gives me the strength  to carry on this bitter fight. I will never give up to fight for the truth. My Husband did not kidnap the Lindberg Baby.
Sincerely, Anna Hauptmann"

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Mrs. Hauptmann Loses Bid to Remove Judge 

The National Law Journal

January 31, 1983

Kathleen Sylvester

The 84-year-old widow of the man executed in 1936 for the kidnapping of the Lindbergh baby lost a bid in the Supreme Court last week to disqualify the judge hearing her $100 million wrongful death suit.

Without comment, the justices refused to hear Anna Hauptmann's plea for the disqualification of U.S. District Judge Frederick Lacey of Newark, N.J. Mrs. Hauptmann claimed that the judge has a conflict of interest because he once practiced law with one of the lawyers who helped prosecute the case against her husband.

The judge said he had "no basis" on which to disqualify himself, and the 3d U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals refused to upset his decision.

Mrs. Hauptmann is suing former prosecutor David Wilentz, the state of New Jersey, the Hearst newspaper chain and others for the $100 million. She claims they knew that her husband, Bruno Richard Hauptmann, was innocent and that they withheld evidence that would have resulted in his acquittal. (NLJ, 2-8-82.)

Sam  Bornstein   to the LKH Public Forum
She didn't know a thing
 May  2,  2003

From Anna Hauptmann's biography, kindly sent to me by Mark Falzini:

"On Christmas (1934) I was permitted to go into see Richard (in the Flemington jail) and to take the baby in to see him but I was not permitted to send him any presents. Christmas night I was overjoyed to receive through the hands of (defense lawyer Lloyd) Fisher a Christmas present from Richard. When he was taken to New Jersey he had only $1.25 in his possession. The day before Christmas, I later found out, he had called Mr. Fisher to his cell and asked him if would do a personal favor for him, one beyond his duties as a lawyer and Mr. Fisher told him he would be happy to. Richard told Mr. Fisher that he had $1.25 down in the warden's office and wished Mr. Fisher would get that money and go out and buy a Christmas present for me and the baby. He told Mr. Fisher that it would not be sufficient to get any very nice presents but hoped he would get the baby something made of wood to play with and Mrs. Hauptmann a string of ripe figs because she was so fond of them and any other little thing that the money might buy. I later found out that Mr. Fisher did not take the $1.25 which Richard had in the warden's office but did go out and buy the things which Richard mentioned together with a few other little things, went back to the jail to get Richard to sign a Christmas greeting to me and then had them delivered to the boarding house where I was staying. It is impossible for me to say what pleasure I got from these presents although tears mingled with joy when I thought of the many happy Christmases we had spent together. To do a thing like this was so like Richard..."

 Your interest in the LKH website is appreciated. If you remember to use the Amazon Search Box below, this website will receive a 4% commission on some of your purchases. Thanks!

Search:

Keywords:

In Association with Amazon.com

 email: ronelle@LindberghKidnappingHoax.com

  Ronelle Delmont's  Lindbergh Kidnapping Hoax  Forum

Michael Melsky's  Lindbergh Kidnapping Discussion Board

  Directory      Books      Search      Home     Forum     Transcript      Sources 

Copyright Lindbergh Kidnapping Hoax 1998 - 2005